From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlHha-0006Kb-S7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:57:31 +0000 Message-ID: <53760B23.9000408@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 05:57:07 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Rate vs Range graphs for ath10k through attentuator. References: <53750D0D.4060106@candelatech.com> <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87vbt56g61.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: ath10k On 05/16/2014 05:50 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >> Just FYI...here's a graph of a UDP upload test through an attenuator. >> The attenuator goes from 0 up to 95.5, though isolation is not perfect >> so even at highest attenuation a small bit of signal gets through. >> >> One interesting thing to me is that ath10k does so well at very hot >> signal strength. ath9k runs like crap with hot signal... >> >> AP is another of our systems, both are using my CT firmware, my 3.14.4+ >> kernel, and WLE900VX NICs. 32 stations were created and associated >> on the station machine, but only one was actively sending any significant >> data. AP system had single active AP vdev, one station interface that was >> not connected. Traffic flow is station send to AP, AP sends back to station >> machine on 1Gbps wired Ethernet connection. Both systems are mobile core-i7 >> CPU, 8GB RAM, etc. >> >> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/ >> >> Lots of graphs in the link above..the most useful ones are: >> >> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-0.png >> >> http://www.candelatech.com/examples/ath10k-rate-vs-range-udp-upload/chart-30.png >> >> The throughput is a bit spikey, possibly because I am only doing 5 second throughput >> tests. Will run a 30-second one some day and hope that smooths out. > > Cool charts. Was this over the air or with cables? Cables, have to run it through the attenuator... Ben > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k