From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Cleanup console loglevels
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:36:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53765ABB.50602@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516175154.GA18834@pd.tnic>
On 05/16/2014 10:51 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:49:21PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> so I was staring at
>>
>> 12544697f12e ("x86_64: be less annoying on boot, v2")
>>
>> and how naked numbers mean sh*t and how I have to grep sources to find
>> out what this 10 thing means. So how about the following cleanup? We can
>> do it this way, we can do accessors and stuff, whatever. But the naked
>> numbers are plain misleading.
>>
>> So how about it? I'm asking whether it makes sense first before I go
>> and replace all tests of console_loglevel with naked numbers around the
>> tree.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> index 068054f4bf20..0029d974e431 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data)
>> */
>> load_ucode_bsp();
>>
>> - if (console_loglevel == 10)
>> + if (console_loglevel >= CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_QUIET)
>
> That's CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_DEBUG, of course.
>
> See, misleading. :-P
>
Absolutely. I'll ack it with that change.
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 17:49 Cleanup console loglevels Borislav Petkov
2014-05-16 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-16 18:36 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53765ABB.50602@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.