From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kref: warn on uninitialized kref
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 15:50:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53776918.7040402@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1405170836070.15837@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On 05/17/14 14:38, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I found a memory leak in iSCSI target that was caused by kref initialized
> to zero (the memory object was allocated with kzalloc, kref_init was not
> called and kref_put_spinlock_irqsave was called which changed "0" to "-1"
> and didn't free the object).
>
> Similar bugs may exist in other kernel areas, so I submit this patch that
> adds a check to kref.h. If the value is zero or negative, we can assume
> that it is uninitialized and we warn about it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/kref.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.15-rc5.orig/include/linux/kref.h 2014-05-16 19:00:18.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.15-rc5/include/linux/kref.h 2014-05-17 13:19:31.000000000 +0200
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static inline int kref_sub(struct kref *
> void (*release)(struct kref *kref))
> {
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> -
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) < (int)count);
> if (atomic_sub_and_test((int) count, &kref->refcount)) {
> release(kref);
> return 1;
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_spinlock_irqs
> unsigned long flags;
>
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
> if (atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))
> return 0;
> spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> @@ -136,6 +137,7 @@ static inline int kref_put_mutex(struct
> struct mutex *lock)
> {
> WARN_ON(release == NULL);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&kref->refcount) <= 0);
> if (unlikely(!atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, -1, 1))) {
> mutex_lock(lock);
> if (unlikely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&kref->refcount))) {
This patch adds two conditional branches and one atomic read to
kref_sub(). What is the performance impact of this patch on kernel code
that uses kref_put() in the hot path ? Has it been considered to enable
the newly added code only if a CONFIG_DEBUG_* macro has been set ?
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-17 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-17 10:49 [PATCH] target: fix memory leak on XCOPY Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-17 10:53 ` [PATCH] kref: warn on uninitialized kref Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-17 11:04 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-17 12:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-17 12:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-17 13:50 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-05-17 21:14 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-18 7:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-19 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-17 22:52 ` [PATCH] target: fix memory leak on XCOPY Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53776918.7040402@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.