On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:51:48 -0700, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:19:00 +0100
> 
> I bet you thought I'd forgotten.

Naaaah... I trust your memory more than mine... ;-)

> You really did mean `&' here, but one very much expects a variable
> called is_foo to be a boolean, and booleans want `&&'.

Actually, the attached patch is a much simpler solution to this particular
one. We already checked that the pin is input-capable. Use the same mask to
check that the pin is also output-capable, and thus open-drain. No need for
an additional variable.

Thanks,

        M.
-- 
Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?