All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Add Baytrail byt-max98090 machine driver
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:56:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5379B91B.5010306@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516185429.GR22111@sirena.org.uk>

Hi

On 05/16/2014 09:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * ASoC still uses legacy GPIOs so we look both GPIOs using
>> +	 * descriptors here, convert them to numbers and release the
>> +	 * acquired descriptors. Once ASoC switches over to GPIO descriptor
>> +	 * APIs we can pass them directly.
>> +	 */
> You could just add the required support to the framework...  it seems
> quicker and simpler.

Looks like Mika was already proposing it :-)
>> +	hp_desc = gpiod_get_index(card->dev->parent, NULL, 0);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(hp_desc))
>> +		return 0;
> This just eats errors, it's broken for deferred probe.

Indeed yes.
>> +	snd_soc_jack_report(jack, SND_JACK_LINEOUT | SND_JACK_LINEIN,
>> +			    SND_JACK_HEADSET | SND_JACK_LINEOUT |
>> +			    SND_JACK_LINEIN);
> Why is this here?

Hmm.. I'd guess either a left over from a test code or attempt to send a 
wrong initial jack state. I'll check.

>> +static int byt_max98090_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct snd_soc_card *soc_card = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +	struct byt_max98090_private *drv = snd_soc_card_get_drvdata(soc_card);
>> +
>> +	snd_soc_jack_free_gpios(&drv->jack, ARRAY_SIZE(hs_jack_gpios),
>> +				hs_jack_gpios);
>> +	snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(soc_card, NULL);
>> +	snd_soc_unregister_card(soc_card);
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> Setting the data to NULL on removal is just a waste of time and is done
> by the core anyway.
>
> You're freeing these in the device level remove path but allocating them
> in the ASoC level probe path.  They should be managed consistently.

Right, thanks for pointing, I was blind to see this.

Your other comments are valid to byt-rt5640 too. I'll update it also 
accordingly.

-- 
Jarkko

      reply	other threads:[~2014-05-19  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-16 13:58 [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Add Baytrail byt-max98090 machine driver Jarkko Nikula
2014-05-16 18:54 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-19  7:56   ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5379B91B.5010306@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.