From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Signed-off-by and aliases Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:37 +0200 Message-ID: <537A35A9.9060406@dachary.org> References: <537A1FAE.9060300@dachary.org> <1400513274.44658.YahooMailNeo@web165002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e6k7SWa54cv4wavU4d7psXEDf3fhn1Ock" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:41486 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932433AbaESQrm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 12:47:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1400513274.44658.YahooMailNeo@web165002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Koleos Fuskus Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --e6k7SWa54cv4wavU4d7psXEDf3fhn1Ock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/05/2014 17:27, Koleos Fuskus wrote: > Please notice that the complete alias is "koleosfuscus" with "c" and no= t "k" and I include a space when the forms ask me for name and family nam= e.=20 Sorry about that : it is fixed in the Reported-by: at https://github.com/= ceph/ceph/pull/1824 Cheers Anyway, I would like to receive advice on this topic. It may be convenien= t for me to do contributions using my real name. I am not aware of the co= pyright problems that I may have for using alias. >=20 > Best, >=20 > koleos >=20 >=20 > On Monday, May 19, 2014 5:19 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >=20 >=20 > Hi Richard, >=20 > It was nice seeing you at the OpenStack summit. Do not hesitate to redi= rect if this question is best answered by someone else at RedHat. As most= of us I'm still unsure who at RedHat has time to devote to Ceph ;-) >=20 > Koleos Fuskus > = would like to contribute code under an alias (this is not its real name).= If I understand correctly, copyright (both in software and litterary wor= ks) allows authors to use aliases. Does RedHat have a position on this ? >=20 > Cheers >=20 > --=20 > Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --e6k7SWa54cv4wavU4d7psXEDf3fhn1Ock Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEUEARECAAYFAlN6NakACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23E+ACfbGvO+Ngqa6zXaM8t1yQbHg4c UM8AmPVJvmetr62QaLNKs+BfvbXxXW0= =gvLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e6k7SWa54cv4wavU4d7psXEDf3fhn1Ock--