All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dangling pointers and/or reentrancy in scmd_eh_abort_handler?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:40:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537B14E5.2090100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537B0E05.80308@acm.org>

Il 20/05/2014 10:10, Bart Van Assche ha scritto:
> REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE is already set before scsi_eh_scmd_add() is called
> since that function is only invoked after the block layer has marked a
> request as "complete". The only callers of scsi_eh_scmd_add() are
> scsi_softirq_done(), scsi_times_out() and scmd_eh_abort_handler(). That
> last function is invoked (indirectly) by scsi_times_out().

Yes, and answering my own question, you cannot have a dangling pointer 
in eh_abort_handler (unless you have a driver bug).  This is because 
once eh_abort_handler is called, you know the interrupt handler will not 
trigger the softirq and scsi_finish_command won't be called.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-20  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-19 14:08 dangling pointers and/or reentrancy in scmd_eh_abort_handler? Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-19 15:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-19 15:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-19 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-19 16:43     ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-20  7:32       ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-20  8:10         ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-20  8:40           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-05-21 14:16       ` Mark Wu
2014-05-21 20:34         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-23  1:28           ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-05-23  9:22             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-20  8:46 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537B14E5.2090100@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.