From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Yang, Libin" <libin.yang@intel.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"Nikkanen, Kimmo" <kimmo.nikkanen@intel.com>,
"Takashi Iwai (tiwai@suse.de)" <tiwai@suse.de>,
"Babu, Ramesh" <ramesh.babu@intel.com>,
"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
"Girdwood, Liam R" <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] set up an sync channel between audio and display driver (i.e. ALSA and DRM)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:07:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537B6FC7.9030307@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140520145729.GB23140@ulmo>
On 20/05/2014 16:57, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:45:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Imre Deak<imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
>>> > >On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 05:52 +0300, Lin, Mengdong wrote:
>>>> > >>This RFC is based on previous discussion to set up a generic
>>>> > >>communication channel between display and audio driver and
>>>> > >>an internal design of Intel MCG/VPG HDMI audio driver. It's still an
>>>> > >>initial draft and your advice would be appreciated
>>>> > >>to improve the design.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>The basic idea is to create a new avsink module and let both drm and
>>>> > >>alsa depend on it.
>>>> > >>This new module provides a framework and APIs for synchronization
>>>> > >>between the display and audio driver.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>1. Display/Audio Client
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>The avsink core provides APIs to create, register and lookup a
>>>> > >>display/audio client.
>>>> > >>A specific display driver (eg. i915) or audio driver (eg. HD-Audio
>>>> > >>driver) can create a client, add some resources
>>>> > >>objects (shared power wells, display outputs, and audio inputs,
>>>> > >>register ops) to the client, and then register this
>>>> > >>client to avisink core. The peer driver can look up a registered
>>>> > >>client by a name or type, or both. If a client gives
>>>> > >>a valid peer client name on registration, avsink core will bind the
>>>> > >>two clients as peer for each other. And we
>>>> > >>expect a display client and an audio client to be peers for each other
>>>> > >>in a system.
>>> > >
>>> > >One problem we have at the moment is the order of calling the system
>>> > >suspend/resume handlers of the display driver wrt. that of the audio
>>> > >driver. Since the power well control is part of the display HW block, we
>>> > >need to run the display driver's resume handler first, initialize the
>>> > >HW, and only then let the audio driver's resume handler run. For similar
>>> > >reasons we have to call the audio suspend handler first and only then
>>> > >the display driver resume handler. Currently we solve this using the
>>> > >display driver's late/early suspend/resume hooks, but we'd need a more
>>> > >robust solution.
>>> > >
>>> > >This seems to be a similar issue to the load time ordering problem that
>>> > >you describe later. Having a real device for avsync that would be a
>>> > >child of the display device would solve the ordering issue in both
>>> > >cases. I admit I haven't looked into it if this is feasible, but I would
>>> > >like to see some solution to this as part of the plan.
>> >
>> >Yeah, this is a big reason why I want real devices - we have piles of
>> >infrastructure to solve these ordering issues as soon as there's a
>> >struct device around. If we don't use that, we need to reinvent all
>> >those wheels ourselves.
> To make the driver core's magic work I think you'd need to find a way to
> reparent the audio device under the display device. Presumably they come
> from two different parts of the device tree (two different PCI devices I
> would guess for Intel, two different platform devices on SoCs). Changing
> the parent after a device has been registered doesn't work as far as I
> know. But even assuming that would work, I have trouble imagining what
> the implications would be on the rest of the driver model.
>
> I faced similar problems with the Tegra DRM driver, and the only way I
> can see to make this kind of interaction between devices work is by
> tacking on an extra layer outside the core driver model.
That's why we need a new avsink device which is a proper child of the
gfx device, and the audio driver needs to use the componentized device
framework so that the suspend/resume ordering works correctly. Or at
least that's been my idea, might be we have some small gaps here and there.
-Daniel
Intel Semiconductor AG
Registered No. 020.30.913.786-7
Registered Office: Badenerstrasse 549, 8048 Zurich, Switzerland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 2:52 [RFC] set up an sync channel between audio and display driver (i.e. ALSA and DRM) Lin, Mengdong
2014-05-20 8:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-20 10:37 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-22 2:46 ` [alsa-devel] " Raymond Yau
2014-05-20 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-20 10:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-20 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-05-20 12:43 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-20 12:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thierry Reding
2014-05-20 13:40 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2014-05-20 13:40 ` [alsa-devel] " Jaroslav Kysela
2014-05-20 14:29 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-20 14:35 ` Vinod Koul
2014-05-20 15:02 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-21 15:56 ` Babu, Ramesh
2014-05-21 16:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-21 17:07 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-22 14:29 ` Lin, Mengdong
2014-05-20 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-20 14:57 ` [alsa-devel] " Thierry Reding
2014-05-20 15:07 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-05-20 15:15 ` Thierry Reding
2014-05-20 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-22 14:59 ` Lin, Mengdong
2014-05-22 19:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-03 1:42 ` Lin, Mengdong
2014-06-03 7:44 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537B6FC7.9030307@intel.com \
--to=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kimmo.nikkanen@intel.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@intel.com \
--cc=libin.yang@intel.com \
--cc=ramesh.babu@intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.