All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Donald D Dugger <donald.d.dugger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] VT-d: honor firmware-first mode in XSA-59 workaround code
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <537DC4AC.4030505@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537DBFB00200007800014C79@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 22/05/14 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 21.05.14 at 18:33, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 21/05/14 17:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> When firmware-first mode is being indicated by firmware, we shouldn't
>>> be modifying AER registers - these ar considered to be owned by
>> "these are"
>>
>>> firmware in that case. Violating this is being reported to result in
>>> SMI (or was it SCI?) storms.
>> SMM livelock.
> IOW "SMI storm".

It wasn't completely clear from the BIOS engineer's description whether
it was a single infinite loop in SMM mode, or an SMI storm, but the
overall effects are still the same.

>
>> The exact problem was a 2.6.32 kernel ignoring firmware-first and
>> disabling reporting on the root ports but not endpoint devices, causing
>> the SMM handler to fail to find the issue, and fail to clear the SMI.
>>
>> However, as part of the investigation, we identified that Xen was also
>> violating firmware-first as part of XSA-59
> So has a problem solely with the XSA-59 workaround (i.e. without an
> ignorant kernel) then been observed at all?
>
> Jan
>

Correct

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-22  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-21 16:09 [PATCH RFC] VT-d: honor firmware-first mode in XSA-59 workaround code Jan Beulich
2014-05-21 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-22  7:13   ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22  9:34     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-05-22 10:06       ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22 10:19         ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-22 10:33           ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-22 14:19             ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-23  1:03               ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23  6:13                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-23  6:40                   ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23  2:32 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23  6:22   ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-23  6:46     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-23  7:15       ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-26  0:39         ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Beulich
2014-06-03 14:38   ` Malcolm Crossley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=537DC4AC.4030505@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.