From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] Devfreq support for Exynos5250/5420 Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:08:17 +0900 Message-ID: <537ED7C1.5030601@samsung.com> References: <1400779322-4410-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:13795 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961AbaEWFIc (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 01:08:32 -0400 In-reply-to: <1400779322-4410-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Abhilash Kesavan Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, t.figa@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com Hi, On 05/23/2014 02:21 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > This patchset adds devfreq support on Exynos5250 and Exynos5420. > The patches add the missing INT clock support for exynos5250 and > also add a new 5420 driver. We also have patches which add the > PPMU node and fix a typo in the exynos5250 driver. > > Changes since RFC v1: > - Exynos5420 support has been added to the existent Exynos5250 > driver itself. > - Rebased on Chanwoo Choi's devfreq consolidation patchset. > - Removed unused clocks from the clock list > - Used the PPMU nodes with different compatible strings to > differentiate between exynos5250 and exynos5420. > > The patches have been tested on Exynos5250 based Snow board and Exynos5420 > based Peach-Pit boards. They have been prepared on linux-next(20140521) with > the devfreq for-next branch merged. Also applied is the "devfreq resource > management" series from Chanwoo Choi[1]. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/25/826 I sent v2 patchset as following after fixed minor issue: [PATCHv2 0/5] devfreq: Support resource management functions and code clean - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/9/74 Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi) Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:08:17 +0900 Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] Devfreq support for Exynos5250/5420 In-Reply-To: <1400779322-4410-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> References: <1400779322-4410-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Message-ID: <537ED7C1.5030601@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 05/23/2014 02:21 AM, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > This patchset adds devfreq support on Exynos5250 and Exynos5420. > The patches add the missing INT clock support for exynos5250 and > also add a new 5420 driver. We also have patches which add the > PPMU node and fix a typo in the exynos5250 driver. > > Changes since RFC v1: > - Exynos5420 support has been added to the existent Exynos5250 > driver itself. > - Rebased on Chanwoo Choi's devfreq consolidation patchset. > - Removed unused clocks from the clock list > - Used the PPMU nodes with different compatible strings to > differentiate between exynos5250 and exynos5420. > > The patches have been tested on Exynos5250 based Snow board and Exynos5420 > based Peach-Pit boards. They have been prepared on linux-next(20140521) with > the devfreq for-next branch merged. Also applied is the "devfreq resource > management" series from Chanwoo Choi[1]. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/25/826 I sent v2 patchset as following after fixed minor issue: [PATCHv2 0/5] devfreq: Support resource management functions and code clean - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/9/74 Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi