From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 26421: regressions - FAIL
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:29:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537F5B5F.1040108@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537F721202000078000155D7@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 23/05/14 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.05.14 at 13:21, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> flight 26421 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/26421/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12 guest-localmigrate.2 fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26361
> So looking at the BSOD here, I'm afraid this is due to the hvmloader
> changes. As can be seen only WinXP has a problem with this, so I
> wonder whether - with support for it having ended - we really still
> need to support it. If we do, I guess for now the only option is to
> revert (until I can find time to try out alternatives, like having
> available two templates - one with and one without a high PCI
> range, returning the one with only if that region isn't empty - or
> see whether the element count in the block could by dynamically
> modified, allowing us to strip off the final field).
>
> Jan
Win2k3 is still in support for another year, and will almost certainly
be affected in the same way.
Even though XP is out of support, there are still many people using it,
so breaking it and removing the tests is rather antisocial.
~Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 11:21 [xen-unstable test] 26421: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2014-05-23 14:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-23 14:29 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537F5B5F.1040108@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.