From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jiri Horky <jiri.horky@gmail.com>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow to reset offset_increment counter
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:59:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537F7E8E.4050200@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537F439E.9040904@gmail.com>
On 2014-05-23 06:48, Jiri Horky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> because I got bitten by this multiple times I decided to give this patch
> a try :)
>
> Current implementation of offset calculation when offset_increment is in
> effect uses global thread_number as follows:
> f->file_offset = td->o.start_offset + (td->thread_number - 1) *
> td->o.offset_increment;
>
> The thread number gets incremented for every job (subjob) so even you
> have multiple jobs with different filenames, the offset calculation is
> shared. I find this very unintuitive, especially in cases the offsets
> gets past the device/file. For example, if one wants to run sequential
> read test in 16 threads of multiple devices (/dev/sd{b,c,d}) in one
> group, which are of 1TB size, and to eliminate caching effect he wants
> each read to start at different offset, the config could look like
> following:
Maybe it would be better to have this offset calculation be on a
per-thread-per-file basis? You are right in that it only makes sense
within the same file or device, so maybe it'd be better to make it work
more like you expect.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 12:48 [PATCH] Allow to reset offset_increment counter Jiri Horky
2014-05-23 16:59 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-05-23 17:24 ` Jiri Horky
2014-06-02 18:28 ` Jiri Horky
2014-07-25 7:47 ` Jiri Horky
2014-07-25 7:51 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537F7E8E.4050200@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiri.horky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.