From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnu3V-0000EI-DE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 14:19:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnu3P-0003RE-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 14:18:57 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:43546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnu3P-0003R8-19 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 14:18:51 -0400 Message-ID: <537F910A.2070902@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 22:18:50 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1400844279-1685-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1400844279-1685-7-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <537F8EF4.9000803@tls.msk.ru> <537F906E.4010101@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <537F906E.4010101@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] libcacard/vcard_emul_nss: Assert vreaderOpt isn't null List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: alevy@redhat.com 23.05.2014 22:16, Michael Tokarev =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > 23.05.2014 22:09, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 23.05.2014 15:24, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> It's not locally obvious, and Coverity can't see it either. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >>> Reviewed-by: Alon Levy >>> --- >>> libcacard/vcard_emul_nss.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/libcacard/vcard_emul_nss.c b/libcacard/vcard_emul_nss.c >>> index 2048917..4f55e44 100644 >>> --- a/libcacard/vcard_emul_nss.c >>> +++ b/libcacard/vcard_emul_nss.c >>> @@ -1181,6 +1181,7 @@ vcard_emul_options(const char *args) >>> vreaderOpt =3D g_renew(VirtualReaderOptions, opts->v= reader, >>> reader_count); >>> } >>> + assert(vreaderOpt); >>> opts->vreader =3D vreaderOpt; >>> vreaderOpt =3D &vreaderOpt[opts->vreader_count]; >>> vreaderOpt->name =3D g_strndup(name, name_length); >> >> Shouldn't the assignment be moved up one line into the if {} >> statement instead? >=20 > Actually it looks like this code is just buggy, it works for just > one iteration. Because at this place, vreaderOpts will be non-NULL > only if we expanded the array. If we didn't (we do that in > READER_STEP increments), we'll be assigning NULL to opts->vreader, > because vreaderOpt will _really_ be NULL here. So, the real fix is: 1) drop =3D NULL at declaration of vreaderOpt; 2) do not mention vreaderOpt inside the if{} statement at all, we don't need indirection there; 3) drop this opts->vreader assignment and ofcourse do not add the assert as in the patch above ;) /mjt > One good example when setting initial values like this (for vreaderOpts= ) > is a Bad Idea (tm). If it weren't needlessly NULL initially, compiler > was able to tell us about using uninitialized variable. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > /mjt >=20