From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnwet-0002ED-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:05:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnweo-0001MQ-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:05:43 -0400 Received: from [2a03:4000:1::4e2f:c7ac:d] (port=42864 helo=v220110690675601.yourvserver.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnweo-0001Lk-Lq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 17:05:38 -0400 Message-ID: <537FB81C.30106@weilnetz.de> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:05:32 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1400315697-27148-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] w32: Fix regression caused by new g_poll implementation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Stanislav Vorobiov , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi , Sangho Park Am 23.05.2014 12:36, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 17 May 2014 09:34, Stefan Weil wrote: >> Commit 5a007547df76446ab891df93ebc55749716609bf tried to fix a >> performance degradation caused by bad handling of small timeouts >> in the original implementation of g_poll. >> >> Since that commit, hard disk I/O no longer works. >> >> Instead of rewriting the g_poll implementation, this patch simply copies >> the original code (released under LGPL) from latest glib and only modifies >> it where needed (see comments in the code). URL of the original code: >> https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/glib/gpoll.c > > Oops, I didn't notice you'd done that. Our util/oslib-win32.c > file is marked as having a more liberal license than LGPL. > So we can't simply copy the LGPL code in without at least > adjusting the top-of-file comment to indicate which parts > of the file are LGPL and which are not. > > thanks > -- PMM > Ah, sorry, I should have read the license comments of oslib-win32.c. Thanks for that review. If it's sufficient to add some lines to the license comment, I can send a patch next week. This weekend is reserved for my family. :-) Or someone else fixes the license statement - that would be fine, too. Stefan