Re: [PATCH] remote-helpers: point at their upstream repositories

[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> Let's try this in a different way, as I sense there is a
> >> misunderstanding somewhere about your "wish".
> >> ...
> > No, I already said I do not want the code removed from v2.0, that's why
> > I sent patches that simply added a warning, and I specifically said
> > those were for 2.0.
> 
> Yeah, I think there are mails crossing.  I sent that "different way"
> way before I read your "already said" happened.
> 
> > So to make it clear, I now request that you do:
> >
> >  1) Remove all the code.
> >
> >     Since my patches were removed from the list, here's an updated patch
> >     that applies on top of 'master'
> >
> >     https://github.com/felipec/git/commits/up/remote/remove
> 
> I'll do that, but just one thing to make sure---do you want the
> helper to exit with status 0?

It doesn't matter; if the remote helper doesn't respond to the commands
transport-helper exits with 128.

> >  4) Re-add the following release note:
> >
> >     * "git push" via transport-helper interface (e.g. remote-hg) has
> >       been updated to allow forced ref updates in a way similar to the
> >       natively supported transports
> 
> I am not sure if this one is consistent with 1), as remote-hg will
> no longer be with the release.

Remove '(e.g. remote-hg)', the rest still applies.

-- 
Felipe Contreras