From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@freescale.com>,
Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@freescale.com>,
Gala Kumar-B11780 <B11780@freescale.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:50:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53807ffa0f2275ffbf492a6d8905dc32@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E03F8C1.60706@freescale.com>
(context put back:)
>> But does that mean that a guest should never be allowed to modify a
>> virtualized
>> timebase register, even if the hypervisor can support it?
>
> The book3e mtspr writeup doesn't appear to specify the behavior when
> writing to a read-only SPR, so perhaps you could argue that something
> other
> than a no-op is implementation-specific behavior.
>> v2.06 III-E 9.2.1:
>> "Writing the Time Base is hypervisor privileged."
>>
>> v2.06 III-E 2.1:
>> "If a hypervisor-privileged register is accessed in the guest
>> supervisor
>> state (MSR[GS PR] = 0b10), an Embedded Hypervisor Privilege exception
>> occurs."
>>
>> (v2.06 III-E 5.4.1, the big SPR table, also shows the TB regs (for
>> writing,
>> i.e. 284 and 285) to be hypervisor privileged. Consistency, hurray
>> :-) )
>
> To me, all this means that a guest cannot write to the actual timebase
> register.
It also means that the hypervisor gets a trap when a guest tries to do
this.
> I'm not interpreting this to mean that a hypervisor can't
> virtualize the timebase and allow a guest to read/write a virtual
> timebase
> register, so that it thinks it's writing to the real hardware timebase
> register.
Yes, a hypervisor can do this. The behaviour of the hardware is not
implementation-specific (modulo bugs ;-) ); when a guest tries to write
to the timebase, the hypervisor gets a trap. The hypervisor can then
do whatever it wants with it.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-24 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 23:04 [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: disable timebase synchronization under the hypervisor Timur Tabi
2011-06-14 23:14 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-14 23:15 ` Timur Tabi
2011-06-14 23:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-15 1:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-15 2:10 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-06-15 2:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-22 11:44 ` Kumar Gala
2011-06-22 14:55 ` Timur Tabi
2011-06-23 17:22 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-23 17:33 ` Timur Tabi
2011-06-23 17:48 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-24 2:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-06-24 2:38 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-06-24 3:50 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2011-06-24 15:16 ` Scott Wood
2011-06-24 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-27 13:35 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53807ffa0f2275ffbf492a6d8905dc32@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=B04825@freescale.com \
--cc=B07421@freescale.com \
--cc=B11780@freescale.com \
--cc=B29882@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.