From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781727FC8A for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2019 15:25:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,518,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="211645750" Received: from mnazeli-mobl.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO linux.fritz.box) ([10.255.175.201]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2019 15:25:35 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Yeoh Ee Peng Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:25:33 +1200 Message-ID: <5382761.1ppftfcbhl@linux.fritz.box> Organization: Intel Corporation In-Reply-To: <1568347121-43357-2-git-send-email-ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com> References: <1568347121-43357-1-git-send-email-ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com> <1568347121-43357-2-git-send-email-ee.peng.yeoh@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bitbake: bitbake-layers: show-recipes: Show unique packagenames X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:25:40 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, 13 September 2019 3:58:39 PM NZST Yeoh Ee Peng wrote: > Currently, show-recipes will show all recipes available (both > recipes with different version and recipes provided by more > than one layer). > > Example of default $ bitbake-layers show-recipes: > core-image-rt: > meta-intel unknown (skipped) > meta unknown (skipped) > > yajl: > meta-oe 2.1.0 > meta-oe 1.0.12 > > Add -p argument to enable showing unique packagenames. This > provide a focus view on unique recipes available. In this context, these aren't package names, they are recipe names - so we need to be using that naming. Accordingly I would recommend -r/--recipe-only as the option name. Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre