All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.15-rc4: circular locking dependency triggered by dm-multipath
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 13:44:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53832919.8080500@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536B1CC1.6080709@suse.de>

On 05/08/14 07:57, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 11:31 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anyone else perhaps already run into this ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bart.
>>
>> ======================================================
>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 3.15.0-rc4-debug+ #1 Not tainted
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> multipathd/10364 is trying to acquire lock:
>>   (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa043bff3>]
>> dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>>   (&(&m->lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffffa077a647>]
>> queue_if_no_path+0x27/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
>>
>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>
>>
>> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>>
>> -> #1 (&(&m->lock)->rlock){..-...}:
>>         [<ffffffff810a56c3>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x1c0
>>         [<ffffffff814ae8eb>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3b/0x50
>>         [<ffffffffa043a3e9>] dm_blk_open+0x19/0x80 [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffff811cbc41>] __blkdev_get+0xd1/0x4c0
>>         [<ffffffff811cc215>] blkdev_get+0x1e5/0x380
>>         [<ffffffff811cc45b>] blkdev_open+0x5b/0x80
>>         [<ffffffff8118a12e>] do_dentry_open.isra.15+0x1de/0x2a0
>>         [<ffffffff8118a300>] finish_open+0x30/0x40
>>         [<ffffffff8119c44d>] do_last.isra.61+0xa5d/0x1200
>>         [<ffffffff8119cca7>] path_openat+0xb7/0x620
>>         [<ffffffff8119d88a>] do_filp_open+0x3a/0x90
>>         [<ffffffff8118bb4e>] do_sys_open+0x12e/0x210
>>         [<ffffffff8118bc4e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
>>         [<ffffffff814b84e2>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
>>
>> -> #0 (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}:
>>         [<ffffffff810a4c46>] __lock_acquire+0x1716/0x1a00
>>         [<ffffffff810a56c3>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x1c0
>>         [<ffffffff814aea56>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x46/0x60
>>         [<ffffffffa043bff3>] dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60
>> [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffffa077a692>] queue_if_no_path+0x72/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
>>         [<ffffffffa077a6f9>] multipath_presuspend+0x19/0x20
>> [dm_multipath]
>>         [<ffffffffa043d34a>] dm_table_presuspend_targets+0x4a/0x60
>> [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffffa043ad5d>] dm_suspend+0x6d/0x1f0 [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffffa043ff63>] dev_suspend+0x1c3/0x220 [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffffa0440759>] ctl_ioctl+0x269/0x500 [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffffa0440a03>] dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x20 [dm_mod]
>>         [<ffffffff811a04c0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x300/0x520
>>         [<ffffffff811a0721>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
>>         [<ffffffff814b84e2>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>
>>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>>         CPU0                    CPU1
>>         ----                    ----
>>    lock(&(&m->lock)->rlock);
>>                                 lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);
>>                                 lock(&(&m->lock)->rlock);
>>    lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);
>>
>>   *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> 2 locks held by multipathd/10364:
>>   #0:  (&md->suspend_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa043ad28>]
>> dm_suspend+0x38/0x1f0 [dm_mod]
>>   #1:  (&(&m->lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffffa077a647>]
>> queue_if_no_path+0x27/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
>>
>> stack backtrace:
>> CPU: 10 PID: 10364 Comm: multipathd Not tainted 3.15.0-rc4-debug+ #1
>> Hardware name: MSI MS-7737/Big Bang-XPower II (MS-7737), BIOS V1.5
>> 10/16/2012
>>   ffffffff81fea150 ffff8807c194fa98 ffffffff814a6780 ffffffff81fea150
>>   ffff8807c194fad8 ffffffff814a36db ffff8807c194fb30 ffff8807c1954c88
>>   0000000000000001 0000000000000002 ffff8807c1954c88 ffff8807c1954440
>> Call Trace:
>>   [<ffffffff814a6780>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
>>   [<ffffffff814a36db>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f
>>   [<ffffffff810a4c46>] __lock_acquire+0x1716/0x1a00
>>   [<ffffffff810a56c3>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x1c0
>>   [<ffffffffa043bff3>] ? dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffff814aea56>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x46/0x60
>>   [<ffffffffa043bff3>] ? dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa043bff3>] dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa077a692>] queue_if_no_path+0x72/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
>>   [<ffffffffa077a6f9>] multipath_presuspend+0x19/0x20 [dm_multipath]
>>   [<ffffffffa043d34a>] dm_table_presuspend_targets+0x4a/0x60 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa043ad5d>] dm_suspend+0x6d/0x1f0 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa043ff63>] dev_suspend+0x1c3/0x220 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa043fda0>] ? table_load+0x350/0x350 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa0440759>] ctl_ioctl+0x269/0x500 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffffa0440a03>] dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x20 [dm_mod]
>>   [<ffffffff811a04c0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x300/0x520
>>   [<ffffffff811ac089>] ? __fget+0x129/0x300
>>   [<ffffffff811abf65>] ? __fget+0x5/0x300
>>   [<ffffffff811ac2d0>] ? __fget_light+0x30/0x160
>>   [<ffffffff811a0721>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
>>   [<ffffffff814b84e2>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
>>
> Hmm. No, I haven't seen it (yet).
> Looking into it.

Hello Hannes,

Not sure if this information helps but apparently the above warning is
not a false positive but indicates a real deadlock. I have been able to
reproduce the above warning with 3.15-rc7. Shortly after the above
message appeared the following was reported:

Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 11
Call Trace:
 <NMI>  [<ffffffff814a7bd0>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
 [<ffffffff8104bb8d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8104bbfc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
 [<ffffffff810e89b5>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0xd5/0x120
 [<ffffffff8112268c>] __perf_event_overflow+0x9c/0x320
 [<ffffffff81017a50>] ? x86_perf_event_set_period+0xe0/0x150
 [<ffffffff811236b4>] perf_event_overflow+0x14/0x20
 [<ffffffff8101e5de>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1ce/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff814affd1>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x50
 [<ffffffff812e6c3f>] ? ghes_copy_tofrom_phys+0x11f/0x210
 [<ffffffff814b28ab>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2b/0x50
 [<ffffffff814b1da2>] nmi_handle.isra.5+0xc2/0x380
 [<ffffffff814b1ce5>] ? nmi_handle.isra.5+0x5/0x380
 [<ffffffff814b21e5>] do_nmi+0x185/0x3e0
 [<ffffffff814b1287>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1e/0x2e
 [<ffffffff8126548d>] ? delay_tsc+0x2d/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8126548d>] ? delay_tsc+0x2d/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8126548d>] ? delay_tsc+0x2d/0xc0
 <<EOE>>  [<ffffffff812653bf>] __delay+0xf/0x20
 [<ffffffff810a86b1>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xe1/0x140
 [<ffffffff814afece>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4e/0x60
 [<ffffffffa0782500>] ? multipath_busy+0x20/0xf0 [dm_multipath]
 [<ffffffffa0782500>] multipath_busy+0x20/0xf0 [dm_multipath]
 [<ffffffffa024e56c>] dm_request_fn+0xcc/0x320 [dm_mod]
 [<ffffffff8123b013>] __blk_run_queue+0x33/0x40
 [<ffffffff8123b205>] blk_delay_work+0x25/0x40
 [<ffffffff8106d7aa>] process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6c0
 [<ffffffff8106d748>] ? process_one_work+0x188/0x6c0
 [<ffffffff8106dd9b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
 [<ffffffff8106dc80>] ? process_one_work+0x6c0/0x6c0
 [<ffffffff810758bd>] kthread+0xed/0x110
 [<ffffffff810757d0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
 [<ffffffff814b972c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810757d0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-26 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-06  9:31 3.15-rc4: circular locking dependency triggered by dm-multipath Bart Van Assche
2014-05-06 13:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-06 13:46   ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-07 20:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-08  5:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 11:44   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-05-26 12:10     ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:20       ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-26 12:29         ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:44           ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:51             ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 14:54               ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-27 13:22                 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 14:49                   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 16:09                     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53832919.8080500@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.