From: "Kumar, Shobhit" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: dsi: fix pipe-off timeout due to port vs. pipe disable ordering
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:57:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5384BCE7.5060005@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401206409-24937-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On 5/27/2014 9:30 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> If we disable first the port (by disabling DPI) and only then the
> display pipe the pipe-off flag will never be set, possibly leading to a
> hanged pipe state at the next modeset-enable.
>
> Note that according to the VLV2 display cluster HAS, we should disable
> the port before the pipe. This doesn't seem to match reality based on
> the above and it's also asymmetric with the enabling sequence, where we
> first enable the port and then the pipe.
>
> v2:
> - send the panel shutdown command before stopping the pipe, since this
> is the recommended sequence (Shobhit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Regards
Shobhit
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 3ea3839..b397465 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -207,14 +207,9 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable_nop(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> */
> }
>
> -static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +static void intel_dsi_pre_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> - int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> - u32 temp;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>
> @@ -222,7 +217,21 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> /* Send Shutdown command to the panel in LP mode */
> dpi_send_cmd(intel_dsi, SHUTDOWN, DPI_LP_MODE_EN);
> msleep(10);
> + }
> +}
>
> +static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> + struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> + int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> + u32 temp;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> +
> + if (is_vid_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> /* de-assert ip_tg_enable signal */
> temp = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe));
> I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(pipe), temp & ~DPI_ENABLE);
> @@ -294,6 +303,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>
> + intel_dsi_disable(encoder);
> +
> intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
>
> val = I915_READ(DSPCLK_GATE_D);
> @@ -692,7 +703,7 @@ bool intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable;
> intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_dsi_pre_enable;
> intel_encoder->enable = intel_dsi_enable_nop;
> - intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_disable;
> + intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_pre_disable;
> intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_dsi_post_disable;
> intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_dsi_get_hw_state;
> intel_encoder->get_config = intel_dsi_get_config;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-27 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 13:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: dsi: fix pipe-off timeout due to port vs. pipe disable ordering Imre Deak
2014-05-27 14:15 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2014-05-27 15:12 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 15:34 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2014-05-27 15:53 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 16:00 ` Imre Deak
2014-05-27 16:27 ` Kumar, Shobhit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5384BCE7.5060005@intel.com \
--to=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.