From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5384BD93.6030502@linutronix.de> References: <1401137894-6096-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:56246 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752688AbaE0QaT (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 12:30:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Jamie Iles , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Alan Tull , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , Dinh Nguyen On 05/27/2014 04:21 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > OK this version applied worked fine. Thank you. > Please check the result because I had to rebase it a little. Looks good. What remains in my queue is: * gpio: dwapb: use irq_linear_revmap() for the faster lookup * gpio: dwapb: use irq_gc_lock() for locking instead bc's lock * gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead of BIT(bit) what do we do about those? > Yours, > Linus Walleij > Sebastian