From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislav Meduna Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Set hardirq tracing to on when idling Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:38:33 +0200 Message-ID: <5384BF89.6010509@meduna.org> References: <1401045323-7116-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> <4559339.apo3Fd10HK@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: minyard@acm.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Minyard To: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Return-path: Received: from www.meduna.org ([92.240.244.38]:42398 "EHLO meduna.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751615AbaE0Qip (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 12:38:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4559339.apo3Fd10HK@wuerfel> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 26.05.2014 11:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It seems like the right thing to do, I just don't understand > why nobody hit this before. Looks like this is what I did hit a month ago and was not able to find the culprit: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg11656.html > How exactly do you see this manifest? If it's clear > that the trace comes from the idle function, maybe > everybody just ignores it? That was definitely what I did ;) -- Stano From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stano@meduna.org (Stanislav Meduna) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:38:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Set hardirq tracing to on when idling In-Reply-To: <4559339.apo3Fd10HK@wuerfel> References: <1401045323-7116-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> <4559339.apo3Fd10HK@wuerfel> Message-ID: <5384BF89.6010509@meduna.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 26.05.2014 11:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It seems like the right thing to do, I just don't understand > why nobody hit this before. Looks like this is what I did hit a month ago and was not able to find the culprit: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg11656.html > How exactly do you see this manifest? If it's clear > that the trace comes from the idle function, maybe > everybody just ignores it? That was definitely what I did ;) -- Stano