From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 76781] New: unable to handle NULL in xfrm_input+0x173, fatal exception in interrupt Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 23:34:19 +0200 Message-ID: <5386565B.7060209@redhat.com> References: <20140528140147.7eaa538e@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1401312501.3645.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38319 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751830AbaE1Ve1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 17:34:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1401312501.3645.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/28/2014 11:28 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 14:01 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 00:07:48 -0700 >> From: "bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org" >> To: "stephen@networkplumber.org" >> Subject: [Bug 76781] New: unable to handle NULL in xfrm_input+0x173, fatal exception in interrupt >> >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76781 >> >> Bug ID: 76781 >> Summary: unable to handle NULL in xfrm_input+0x173, fatal >> exception in interrupt >> Product: Networking >> Version: 2.5 >> Kernel Version: 3.15.0-rc6 >> Hardware: x86-64 >> OS: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: Other >> Assignee: shemminger@linux-foundation.org >> Reporter: cate@cateee.net >> Regression: No >> >> See also the fatal oops in: >> >> http://cateee.net/kernel/IMG_20140522_225238.jpg >> http://cateee.net/kernel/IMG_20140523_082629.jpg >> >> >> It seems it happens "often": twice in last few hours I used the new kernels. >> (the first oops was with 3.15.0-rc5-00270-gfba69f0) >> >> I had also usual debian unstable updates, and I just finished to instal aiccu >> (a sixxs program for dynamic ip6to4, so I'm not sure it is a recent bug or just >> I forced it to appear in very last HEAD. > > Right, commit 61622cc6f29034d0 is buggy. Steffen already replied some days ago here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg283705.html