From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BA829E00B68; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [216.86.168.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACF0E00A2F for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (unknown [50.120.89.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C54A1509B8 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 15:45:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53878E34.8060403@bsmucker.eu.org> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 12:44:52 -0700 From: Brian Smucker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <537F9583.50407@bsmucker.eu.org> <2317978.pEesILAVCv@koontz> <53876533.7080306@bsmucker.eu.org> <2207252.t1leCgR7Kn@koontz> In-Reply-To: <2207252.t1leCgR7Kn@koontz> Subject: Re: Yocto with Initial RamFS X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:45:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 5/29/2014 12:38 PM, Søren Holm wrote: > Torsdag den 29. maj 2014 09:49:55 skrev Brian Smucker: >> Thanks Soren, >> >> My followup question is: Can I mix toolchains in this situation? >> >> Can I compile the initramfs binaries with the uclibc toolchain based on >> the poky-tiny distro and the regular file system binaries with the >> glibc-based toolchain (based on a different distro)? >> >> If this is possible, how would I begin to do it? > I don't know, but I've got a simmilar need. Basically I was a very minimal > busybox-static for the initramfs, but a "full-fledged" version for the main > rootfs. I guess that's somehow the same thing. > > Maybe you have an idea on how to do that? I don't know. I'm somewhat of a newbie here. It seems this type of requirement should not be unusual in the embedded space. Am hoping others can weigh in on this. Thanks, Brian