All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: remove the unnecssary checking for pci_bus_add_device
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:42:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5387EFFE.8020707@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530020751.GA4607@google.com>

On 2014/5/30 10:07, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:01:04PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Kernel will WARN_ON(retval < 0) if device_attach() fail with
>> error in pci_bus_add_device(). currently, all the kernel code
>> to check pci_bus_add_device() return value only for printing
>> warning message, no other actions. So we can remove the
>> unnecessary checking codes.
> 
> If we remove all the checks of the return value, why wouldn't we convert it
> to a void function?  If we keep the return value, it seems like we're
> saying "this function could fail someday," but we removing all the code
> that would actually *check* for that failure.
> 
> If you convert it to void, please just squash them all into a single patch.

Hi Bjorn,
   I didn't convert it to void because the device_attach() has a __must_check prefix
which need a retval to avoid compiler warning. But as you mentioned, maybe this will
make people confuse. I will rework it and squash them into a single one.

Thanks!
Yijing.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/bus.c   |    6 +-----
>>  drivers/pci/iov.c   |    2 +-
>>  include/linux/pci.h |    2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> index ba2bf55..f0efbee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
>> @@ -266,16 +266,12 @@ void pci_bus_add_devices(const struct pci_bus *bus)
>>  {
>>  	struct pci_dev *dev;
>>  	struct pci_bus *child;
>> -	int retval;
>>  
>>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>>  		/* Skip already-added devices */
>>  		if (dev->is_added)
>>  			continue;
>> -		retval = pci_bus_add_device(dev);
>> -		if (retval)
>> -			dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error adding device (%d)\n",
>> -				retval);
>> +		pci_bus_add_device(dev);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> index de7a747..cb6f247 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int virtfn_add(struct pci_dev *dev, int id, int reset)
>>  	pci_device_add(virtfn, virtfn->bus);
>>  	mutex_unlock(&iov->dev->sriov->lock);
>>  
>> -	rc = pci_bus_add_device(virtfn);
>> +	pci_bus_add_device(virtfn);
>>  	sprintf(buf, "virtfn%u", id);
>>  	rc = sysfs_create_link(&dev->dev.kobj, &virtfn->dev.kobj, buf);
>>  	if (rc)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 65f22e8..3c4c0cf 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn);
>>  struct pci_dev *pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn);
>>  void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus);
>>  unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
>> -int __must_check pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +int pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>  void pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child);
>>  struct resource *pci_find_parent_resource(const struct pci_dev *dev,
>>  					  struct resource *res);
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-30  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-29  7:01 [PATCH 0/3] cleanup unnecessary checking for pci_bus_add_device() Yijing Wang
2014-05-29  7:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: remove the unnecssary checking for pci_bus_add_device Yijing Wang
2014-05-30  2:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-05-30  2:42     ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-05-29  7:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] platform/x86: remove the unnecessary " Yijing Wang
2014-05-29  7:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] edac: " Yijing Wang
2014-05-29 22:13   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5387EFFE.8020707@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.