From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [RFC] Sort out S5P SoCs support in mainline Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 03:47:55 +0900 Message-ID: <5388D25B.4020106@samsung.com> References: <021f01cf7a61$69853e30$3c8fba90$@samsung.com> <5385C3AE.1020602@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:34900 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754324AbaE3SsA (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 14:48:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p10so1233912pdj.35 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:48:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5385C3AE.1020602@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Kukjin Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Olof Johansson' , 'Kyungmin Park' , 'Arnd Bergmann' On 05/28/14 20:08, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On 2014-05-28 12:41, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> I'm wondering who need to support following SoCs/boards in mainline. >> >> * S5P64X0/SMDK6440 and SMDK6450 >> * S5PC100/SMDKC100 >> >> If nobody is using them, how about to remove them from mainline? > > I'm okay with removing S5PC100. > Thanks for your confirm on S5PC100. - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 03:47:55 +0900 Subject: [RFC] Sort out S5P SoCs support in mainline In-Reply-To: <5385C3AE.1020602@samsung.com> References: <021f01cf7a61$69853e30$3c8fba90$@samsung.com> <5385C3AE.1020602@samsung.com> Message-ID: <5388D25B.4020106@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/28/14 20:08, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On 2014-05-28 12:41, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> I'm wondering who need to support following SoCs/boards in mainline. >> >> * S5P64X0/SMDK6440 and SMDK6450 >> * S5PC100/SMDKC100 >> >> If nobody is using them, how about to remove them from mainline? > > I'm okay with removing S5PC100. > Thanks for your confirm on S5PC100. - Kukjin