From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [RFC] Sort out S5P SoCs support in mainline Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 03:50:13 +0900 Message-ID: <5388D2E5.5080006@samsung.com> References: <021f01cf7a61$69853e30$3c8fba90$@samsung.com> <13875033.1X6R9lksgc@wuerfel> <5385C3CC.6010509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:36683 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754324AbaE3SuS (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 14:50:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id fa1so936872pad.36 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5385C3CC.6010509@gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Olof Johansson' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Kyungmin Park' , Kukjin Kim , 'Marek Szyprowski' On 05/28/14 20:09, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 28.05.2014 13:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 19:41:41 Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm wondering who need to support following SoCs/boards in mainline. >>> >>> * S5P64X0/SMDK6440 and SMDK6450 >>> * S5PC100/SMDKC100 >>> >>> If nobody is using them, how about to remove them from mainline? >> >> I talked about this with Tomasz Figa before, he also thinks they can be removed. >> I don't see any reason to keep them myself, and will apply a patch to remove >> them. Of course, if later somebody comes around who does need them, we can >> revert the patch to bring them back. Yeah, agreed. > > Or better, if later somebody comes around who does need them, we can add > them properly, using Device Tree and existing generic code. > Of course. > Anyway, for removal of both s5p64x0 and s5pc100: > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Actually I have played a bit with the code to see how much can be > removed and ended up with following branch: > > https://github.com/tom3q/linux.git v3.17-cleanup > > Feel free to do _whatever_ you want with patches there. > OK, thanks. Let me remove them from mainline when 3.16-rc1 is released... - Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 03:50:13 +0900 Subject: [RFC] Sort out S5P SoCs support in mainline In-Reply-To: <5385C3CC.6010509@gmail.com> References: <021f01cf7a61$69853e30$3c8fba90$@samsung.com> <13875033.1X6R9lksgc@wuerfel> <5385C3CC.6010509@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5388D2E5.5080006@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/28/14 20:09, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 28.05.2014 13:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 19:41:41 Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm wondering who need to support following SoCs/boards in mainline. >>> >>> * S5P64X0/SMDK6440 and SMDK6450 >>> * S5PC100/SMDKC100 >>> >>> If nobody is using them, how about to remove them from mainline? >> >> I talked about this with Tomasz Figa before, he also thinks they can be removed. >> I don't see any reason to keep them myself, and will apply a patch to remove >> them. Of course, if later somebody comes around who does need them, we can >> revert the patch to bring them back. Yeah, agreed. > > Or better, if later somebody comes around who does need them, we can add > them properly, using Device Tree and existing generic code. > Of course. > Anyway, for removal of both s5p64x0 and s5pc100: > > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa > > Actually I have played a bit with the code to see how much can be > removed and ended up with following branch: > > https://github.com/tom3q/linux.git v3.17-cleanup > > Feel free to do _whatever_ you want with patches there. > OK, thanks. Let me remove them from mainline when 3.16-rc1 is released... - Kukjin