From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 582A6E00AD2; Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.160.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA81E00457 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id md12so2901609pbc.15 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z9CH6NK4cbgk47Ang4xeDnhQPz1Sbagb5lpZHQ/cN80=; b=LFUB6pQSfRdSc9NOkCHsjtPvMe8a2vO6FjM/1BQxwWuTxVxJ2suxoVhSoY4SgTgROn QgA3Ya636rY+TpF/rJz+qftmDAJTm8EO33GHxQIvG3B9Y3wARuFIZU96i46/fr08tEQn 0rQU8pn82AzQJPMNmTBZqFyLh2z92nrBas8nC29yIc4B1k5eYEfzs3itPFpd+Gh5KKsn hzDL2kWfB41hWzxhEJ9zhZirhwryaRfE6zdfLxQj3Ewul1cjchTCBdAacDbaPSCPd3UM OCrERuyforflTH0bIDVbnNUwwIisNkcO3+93abYvNgYoDy8nKuCWI96gASjz1wLpQ1OG 2Bjg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkflCZFzrZltGkAGb6UJOKsg4svLCrayQ70350nb81n63VeWmlOHcnUDnTfu1zYPtok5CNS X-Received: by 10.66.122.36 with SMTP id lp4mr29168491pab.82.1401571001835; Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.124] ([63.226.49.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tg9sm12774970pbc.29.2014.05.31.14.16.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538A46B6.3030500@boundarydevices.com> Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 14:16:38 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Bergin , Otavio Salvador References: <43F0718C449F6A46B393DA2BEC8E01280C4F2C34@post.tritech.se> <537FE543.10108@boundarydevices.com> <537FEE9F.4040301@boundarydevices.com> <537FF487.4060702@boundarydevices.com> <43F0718C449F6A46B393DA2BEC8E01280C4F3037@post.tritech.se> <5384FF84.3090209@boundarydevices.com> <43F0718C449F6A46B393DA2BEC8E01280C4F3490@post.tritech.se> <5385EC8A.9090004@boundarydevices.com> <43F0718C449F6A46B393DA2BEC8E01280C4F3864@post.tritech.se> <53893656.10204@boundarydevices.com> In-Reply-To: <53893656.10204@boundarydevices.com> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Troy Subject: Re: No HDMI signal from Nitrogen6x board with daisy X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 21:16:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, On 05/30/2014 06:54 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 05/28/2014 09:09 AM, Peter Bergin wrote: >> Hi Eric, >> >> On 05/28/2014 04:03 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> Thanks Peter, >>> >>> On 05/27/2014 11:51 PM, Peter Bergin wrote: >>>> Hi Eric, >>>> >>>> On 05/27/2014 11:11 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> On 05/25/2014 11:43 PM, Peter Bergin wrote: >>>>>> Hi Eric, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I haven't yet found a TO 1.0 board to test against. > > > After trying everything else (hard-coding your EDID, and using a DVI > cable), I managed to find a board with Silicon Revision 1.0, and > it's failing more or less as you described: > > - 640x480 works > - 1920x1080p fails > > I also see those "timeout waiting for flip irq" messages whenever > switching to a resolution that doesn't function. > > I'm not sure why, but it's probably time to grep through those pesky > tests for tapeout: > imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0 > > TO 1.0 **did** work at 1080P in the older kernels. > Can anyone confirm 1080P HDMI support on 3.10.17 or 3.10.31 on other boards with TO 1.0? I know it's been a long time since they stopped shipping, but there must be some SABRE SD's or other boards around with older silicon. Please advise, Eric