From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vyasevic@redhat.com,
sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] bridge netlink dump interface at par with brctl Actually better than brctl showmacs because we can filter by bridge port in the kernel
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 08:24:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538B1B62.1060400@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538B19A9.4050607@mojatatu.com>
Additional note:
This is also on top of Roopa's patch.
cheers,
jamal
On 06/01/14 08:16, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> This is mostly to you Vlad since you brought it up earlier.
> I ended using ifm instead of ndm. Currently there is lack of
> symettry - we send requests with ifm and get responses with
> ndms. Unfortunately after spending 2-3 hours I came to the
> conclusion i cant change it without breaking old iproute2s that
> were expecting this behavior. What we have here is a magnitude
> better filtering but we could have done slightly better if we
> were able to use an ndm. A little acrobatics later on to filter
> by vlans may work..
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-01 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 11:56 [net-next PATCH 1/2] bridge fdb dumping takes a filter device Dumping a bridge fdb dumps every fdb entry held. With this change we are going to filter on selected bridge port Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-06-01 11:56 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] bridge netlink dump interface at par with brctl Actually better than brctl showmacs because we can filter by bridge port in the kernel Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-06-01 12:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-06-01 12:24 ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message]
2014-06-02 15:34 ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-06-02 22:17 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-06-05 7:15 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] bridge fdb dumping takes a filter device Dumping a bridge fdb dumps every fdb entry held. With this change we are going to filter on selected bridge port David Miller
2014-06-07 12:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538B1B62.1060400@mojatatu.com \
--to=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.