All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xsave: Remove xfeat_mask checking from validate_xstate()
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:07:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538C4CE6.5000501@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538C39160200007800016AD3@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 02/06/14 07:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 30.05.14 at 13:57, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> What further sanity checking would be wanted/needed?
>>
>> The sending Xen must have gotten this correct else it wouldn't have an 
>> xsave area to send in the first place.  If the receiving the Xen found 
>> parts it didn't like, the local validity checks would fail.
>>
>> As far as I can see, the only case this might do something unexpected is 
>> if the individual xfeature_mask got changed on transit, at which point 
>> the receiving Xen would fail the xsave load, despite the xsave area 
>> being valid for the current cpu.
> Whether the loading would fail really depends on what exactly became
> corrupted.

The current behaviour is that the load would fail, as validate_xstate()
would fail.

>
> But in the end the question is - are you intending to no longer
> communicate this bit of information in the v2 migration stream?
>
> Jan
>

Ideally I would like to cease communicating this in the v2 stream.

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-30  8:39 [PATCH] x86/xsave: Remove xfeat_mask checking from validate_xstate() Andrew Cooper
2014-05-30 11:39 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-30 11:57   ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-02  6:43     ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-02 10:07       ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-06-02 10:43         ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-02 12:02           ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538C4CE6.5000501@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.