From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrPsT-0004jE-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:54:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrPsK-0004E5-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:54:05 -0400 Received: from slb-mail0.epfl.ch ([2001:620:618:1e0:1:80b2:e058:1]:56147 helo=smtp0.epfl.ch) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrPsK-0004Dq-DA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:53:56 -0400 Message-ID: <538C57C0.7090303@epfl.ch> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:53:52 +0200 From: Jack Biggs MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <538847AC.6040108@epfl.ch> <5388B101.4010809@twiddle.net> <538C32DA.5000809@epfl.ch> <87wqczsll1.fsf@linaro.org> <538C4EA6.6020306@epfl.ch> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Question about gen_jmp_tb List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Peter, This is not a problem for now, the main reason we wanted to have this at the end is to potentially trace load / stores in the future. How would you recommend integrating this into icount? Just wanting to make sure I don't run into anything unexpected. Regards, Jack On 06/02/2014 12:47 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > If you can rearrange your design to only require your hooks to be > called at the *start* of a TB, not the end, that is much easier -- the > existing icount machinery does that already. thanks -- PMM