From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrU1R-00088v-Ju for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:19:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrU1J-0008FZ-6t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:19:37 -0400 Received: from averel.grnet-hq.admin.grnet.gr ([195.251.29.3]:5140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrU1I-0008FC-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:19:29 -0400 Message-ID: <538C929B.6000304@grnet.gr> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:04:59 +0300 From: Chrysostomos Nanakos MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1401718539-11304-1-git-send-email-cnanakos@grnet.gr> <1401718539-11304-2-git-send-email-cnanakos@grnet.gr> <538C8A7D.1020402@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <538C8A7D.1020402@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] block: Support Archipelago as a QEMU block backend List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com Hi, On 06/02/2014 05:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/02/2014 08:15 AM, Chrysostomos Nanakos wrote: >> VM Image on Archipelago volume is specified like this: >> >> file=archipelago:[/mport=[:vport=]] >> or > I still think that there is no need to burden the code with this > shorthand... If everyone agrees I can totally remove that part. > >> file.driver=archipelago,file.volume=[,file.mport=[, >> file.vport=]] > ...when this version is easier to support. Older protocols have file= > abuse due to back-compat reasons, but new protocols should not start out > with baggage. > > >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 5 + >> block/Makefile.objs | 1 + >> block/archipelago.c | 1174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This is a lot to review at once - is there any reasonable way to break > it into a series of smaller patches? It will be really difficult to break it in smaller patches, and I believe it will more difficult for someone to review it. > > I still don't see anything added to the QMP blockdev-add command. > Totally forgot it, sorry for that. I will make the changes in v3, in a different patch! Regards, Chrysostomos.