All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com,
	magnus.damn@opensource.se, horms@verge.net.au,
	yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sh_eth: use RNC mode for R8A7790/R87791
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:55:38 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538CE4CA.4090301@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140602.134915.1162774321657125992.davem@davemloft.net>

On 06/03/2014 12:49 AM, David Miller wrote:

>>     Looks like the early SH2/3 SoCs didn't implement the whole register.
>> Despite that, sh_eth_dev_init() always writes to this register... :-/
>> So far, the RMCR.RNC bit was mostly set for the Gigabit-capable
>> controllers, however that rule wasn't strictly followed. Well, this
>> driver is still a mess, and it's hard to deal with it without the
>> necessary documentation.

> Why don't we therefore:

> 1) Skip the register write if the per-chip value is zero.

    I rather thought about not writing when the register is not implemented.
I'll probably look into this when I have time.

> 2) Add the RNC bit to all of the gigabit capable controllers.

    I probably misspoke -- all the Gigabit controllers already have it set, 
it's just that some 100 MBbps ones have it set, but most don't.

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-02 17:17 [PATCH v2] sh_eth: use RNC mode for R8A7790/R87791 Ben Dooks
2014-06-02 18:53 ` David Miller
2014-06-02 19:06   ` Ben Dooks
2014-06-02 19:33   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-02 20:49     ` David Miller
2014-06-02 20:55       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-06-02 21:05         ` David Miller
2014-06-02 21:17           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-03  2:45       ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-02 22:26 Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-02 22:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-03 11:19 ` Ben Dooks
2014-06-03 11:19   ` Ben Dooks
2014-06-03 20:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-03 20:02   ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538CE4CA.4090301@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damn@opensource.se \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.