All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:20:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ttx82jx1i.fsf@mina86.com>

Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Aneesh, can you test this series?

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:20:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ttx82jx1i.fsf@mina86.com>

Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Aneesh, can you test this series?

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:20:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ttx82jx1i.fsf@mina86.com>

Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Aneesh, can you test this series?

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:20:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ttx82jx1i.fsf@mina86.com>

Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Aneesh, can you test this series?

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:20:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D9363.7020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1ttx82jx1i.fsf@mina86.com>

Il 03/06/2014 09:02, Michal Nazarewicz ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Now, we have general CMA reserved area management framework,
>> so use it for future maintainabilty. There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
>

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Aneesh, can you test this series?

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-03  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-03  1:11 [RFC PATCH 0/3] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management functionality Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  6:56   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  6:56     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  6:56     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  6:56     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  6:56     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  6:56     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-10  2:41     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:41       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:41       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:41       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:41       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-05 17:39   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:51     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:39     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-10  2:57     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  3:01       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  3:01       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  3:01       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  3:01       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] DMA, CMA: use general CMA reserved area management framework Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  7:00   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:00     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:00     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:00     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:00     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:00     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-10  2:49     ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:49       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:49       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:49       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-10  2:49       ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11  8:24       ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11  8:24         ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11  8:24         ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11  8:24         ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-11  8:24         ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  1:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] PPC, KVM, " Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  1:11   ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-03  7:02   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:02     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:02     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:02     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:02     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  7:02     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-06-03  9:20     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-06-03  9:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03  9:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03  9:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-03  9:20       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-05 17:00       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:12         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-06-05 17:00         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538D9363.7020203@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.