[PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Move setting of mux to irq type from unmask to request_resources

[hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)]

Hi,

On 06/02/2014 01:59 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> With level triggered interrupt mask / unmask will get called for each
>> interrupt, doing the somewhat expensive mux setting on each unmask thus is
>> not a good idea. Instead add a request_resources callback and do it there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> index c199337..61d3246 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
>> @@ -531,6 +531,19 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>   	return irq_find_mapping(pctl->domain, desc->irqnum);
>>   }
>>
>> +static int sunxi_pinctrl_irq_request_resources(struct irq_data *d)
>> +{
>> +	struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> +	struct sunxi_desc_function *func;
>> +
>> +	func = sunxi_pinctrl_desc_find_function_by_pin(pctl,
>> +					pctl->irq_array[d->hwirq], "irq");
>
> I know you're just moving code here, but we should add a check for
> func being !NULL here, otherwise, the kernel is going to blow up at
> the next line.
>
> And since gpio_to_irq might not be called before the request_irq, you
> might be in such a case.

Ok, will do for v3 of the patch-set.

Regards,

Hans