All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	<linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>, <magnus.damm@opensource.se>,
	<horms@verge.net.au>, <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v3] sh_eth: use RNC mode for packet reception
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:29:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538E685A.1000505@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401794473-30050-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>

Hi Ben,

(2014/06/03 20:21), Ben Dooks wrote:
> The current behaviour of the sh_eth driver is not to use the RNC bit
> for the receive ring. This means that every packet recieved is not only
> generating an IRQ but it also stops the receive ring DMA as well until
> the driver re-enables it after unloading the packet.
> 
> This means that a number of the following errors are generated due to
> the receive packet FIFO overflowing due to nowhere to put packets:
> 
> 	net eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow
> 
> Since feedback from Yoshihiro Shimoda shows that every supported LSI
> for this driver should have the bit enabled it seems the best way is
> to remove the RMCR default value from the per-system data and just
> write it when initialising the RMCR value. This is discussed in
> the message (http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg284912.html).
> 
> I have tested the RMCR_RNC configuration with NFS root filesystem and
> the driver has not failed yet.  There are further test reports from
> Sergei Shtylov and others for both the R8A7790 and R8A7791.
> 
> There is also feedback fron Cao Minh Hiep[1] which reports the
> same issue in (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/316285)
> showing this fixes issues with losing UDP datagrams under iperf.
> 
> Tested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>

Thank you very much for the patch.

Acked-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-03 11:21 [RFC/PATCH v3] sh_eth: use RNC mode for packet reception Ben Dooks
2014-06-04  0:29 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2014-06-04  1:26   ` Simon Horman
2014-06-04  2:29 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538E685A.1000505@renesas.com \
    --to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@opensource.se \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.