From: Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Harald Hoyer <harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: initramfs <initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: iBFT oddities
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:52:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538ED042.8000904@suse.de> (raw)
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup a machine with root on iSCSI via iBFT
(on SR-IOV, yay!).
But anyhow, I'll be setting 'ip=ibft' on the commandline as per
documentation and the iBFT settings are applied and everything is
nice and dandy.
It's only that dracut complains during boot:
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: ibft
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: Warning: Please supply
bootdev argument for multiple ip= lines
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: Warning: Setting
bootdev to 'ibft0'
Looking closer, setting 'ip=ibft' triggers 'ibft_to_cmdline()',
which will add _another_ ip= argument to the dracut commandline.
And consequently parse_ip_opts() complains here.
While it's quite easy to fix (just ignore ip=ibft when checking for
duplicate ip arguments), I do wonder whether this is the correct way.
Thing is, 'ip=ibft' is not really an ip setting, but rather a marker
that iBFT should be evaluated.
As such, wouldn't 'rd.iscsi.firmware=ibft' be a more appropriate
setting?
Seeing that the ip argument is added to the commandline anyway,
having a duplicate 'ip=ibft' setting does look a bit odd.
And confuses the logic ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 7:52 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
[not found] ` <538ED042.8000904-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 11:50 ` iBFT oddities Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <538F0800.80008-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <538F0CAD.5050407-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 12:16 ` Harald Hoyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538ED042.8000904@suse.de \
--to=hare-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.