From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Cc: paolo.valente@unimore.it, keir@xen.org,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org,
dario.faggioli@citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com,
etrudeau@broadcom.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
JBeulich@suse.com, Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/14] arch/arm: unmap partially-mapped I/O-memory regions
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:09:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53907A18.8060608@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401976980.15729.99.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk>
On 06/05/2014 03:03 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 17:04 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Arianna,
>>
>> On 25/05/14 11:51, Arianna Avanzini wrote:
>>> This commit changes the interface of apply_p2m_changes() to accept
>>> optionally the pointer to a counter of successfully performed
>>> mappings; such a counter is used only in case of INSERT operation.
>>> If an error is encountered during the operation, and therefore the
>>> mapping is only partially performed, such a counter is useful to
>>> let the caller be able to undo what has just been done.
>>
>> I don't think you need to introduce another argument to
>> apply_p2m_changes. You can directly call apply_p2m_changes with the
>> whole range.
>
> Due to the sanity checks which Arianna is adding to the unmap/REMOVE
> case I think it would no longer be valid to call unmap on the entire
> range unless the entire range was successfully mapped.
>
> I was nearly going to suggest that apply_p2m_changes could return the
> number of successful mappings so that the caller could check actual ==
> expected, but that removes the possibility to provide a specific error
> code as well, so I think that is not acceptable.
>
> I can't remember: did we consider and discard the possibility that
> apply_p2m_changes should unwind its own progress on failure to INSERT
> (perhaps by recursively calling itself with REMOVE)? That would seem to
> be what most callers of INSERT would expect I think (despite many of
> them passing NULL for this new argument here)
We didn't consider this solution. I think unwind the mapping in this
function would be better.
Most the function which pass NULL handle only one mapping at the time
(except guest_physmap_add_entry but there is only one caller with an
order > 0 which is located in arch/arm/domain_build.c).
In anycase, I think it's safer to unwind the whole range if we fail to
add on mapping.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-05 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-25 10:51 [PATCH v8 00/14] Implement the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall for ARM Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] arch/arm: domain build: let dom0 access I/O memory of mapped devices Arianna Avanzini
2014-06-10 15:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] arch/arm: add consistency check to REMOVE p2m changes Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 15:50 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-05 13:45 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 13:50 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] arch/arm: let map_mmio_regions() take pfn as parameters Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] arch/arm: let map_mmio_regions() use start and count Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 15:56 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-05 13:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] arch/arm: unmap partially-mapped I/O-memory regions Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 16:04 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-05 14:03 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 14:09 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] arch/x86: warn if to-be-removed mapping does not exist Arianna Avanzini
2014-06-05 14:06 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] arch/x86: cleanup memory_mapping DOMCTL Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-26 9:57 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] xen/common: move memory_type_changed() function to common code Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 16:15 ` Julien Grall
2014-05-26 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-05 14:08 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] xen/x86: factor out map and unmap from the memory_mapping DOMCTL Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-26 10:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] xen/common: move the memory_mapping DOMCTL hypercall to common code Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 16:42 ` Julien Grall
2014-05-26 10:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-26 11:03 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-05 14:21 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 14:33 ` Tim Deegan
2014-06-05 14:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-26 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] tools/libxl: parse optional start gfn from the iomem config option Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] tools/libxl: handle the iomem parameter with the memory_mapping hcall Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 17:04 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-05 14:27 ` Ian Campbell
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] tools/libxl: explicitly grant access to needed I/O-memory ranges Arianna Avanzini
2014-05-25 17:08 ` Julien Grall
2014-05-26 10:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-26 10:58 ` Julien Grall
2014-05-26 11:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-05 14:31 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 14:37 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-05 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-05 14:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-26 10:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-25 10:51 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] xen/common: do not implicitly permit access to mapped I/O memory Arianna Avanzini
2014-07-01 10:45 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] Implement the XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall for ARM Julien Grall
2014-07-01 10:55 ` Arianna Avanzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53907A18.8060608@citrix.com \
--to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=etrudeau@broadcom.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=viktor.kleinik@globallogic.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.