From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:49:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: lager: add i2c1, i2c2 pins Message-Id: <5390ADA2.6070002@cogentembedded.com> List-Id: References: <1392224674-5328-2-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392224674-5328-2-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 06/05/2014 08:30 PM, Ben Dooks wrote: >>>> Add pinctrl definitions for i2c1 and i2c2 busses on the Lager board >>>> to ensure these are setup correctly at initialisation time. The i2c0 >>>> and i2c3 busses are connected to single function pins. >>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>> I have queued up the following. >>> There was some fuzz when applying this patch, please check that the >>> following is correct. >>> From: Ben Dooks >>> [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: lager: add i2c1, i2c2 pins >>> Add pinctrl definitions for i2c1 and i2c2 busses on the Lager board >>> to ensure these are setup correctly at initialisation time. The i2c0 >>> and i2c3 busses are connected to single function pins. >>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >>> [horms+renesas@verge.net.au: Added shmobile to patch title] >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >>> index ee80788..e33ed0d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >>> @@ -139,6 +139,16 @@ >>> states = <3300000 1 >>> 1800000 0>; >>> }; >>> + >>> + i2c1_pins: i2c1 { >>> + renesas,groups = "i2c1"; >>> + renesas,function = "i2c1"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + i2c2_pins: i2c2 { >>> + renesas,groups = "i2c2"; >>> + renesas,function = "i2c2"; >>> + }; >> These subnodes ended up added to a wrong node, they should have been >> added to the PFC node below. > Thanks, it is not obvious from just looking at them. It was obvious from the context, actually. WBR, Sergei