From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hongyang Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] libxl: network buffering cmdline switch Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:34:00 +0800 Message-ID: <539160D8.9020900@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1401932069-16460-1-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1401932069-16460-6-git-send-email-yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com> <21392.43321.897318.194313@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21392.43321.897318.194313@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, yunhong.jiang@intel.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, rshriram@cs.ubc.ca, roger.pau@citrix.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/06/2014 01:30 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH v10 5/5] libxl: network buffering cmdline switch"): >> Command line switch to 'xl remus' command, to enable network buffering. >> Pass on this flag to libxl so that it can act accordingly. > > You provide a global option to control the script, but no per-domain > config option. Why ? > > A similar question arises about the network buffering boolean. > > Wouldn't it be better if these were options on the devices, in the > domain configuration ? Do you mean we make "-n -N" options into domain configuration? I think these options are only related to remus and may not be used that often because we provided a default network script which would be suitable for most cases. these options are sort of second choices for users, may not worth to be set in the domain configuration. > > Feel free to tell me I'm wrong and it is better this way, if that's > true - just explain it. > >> + * TODO: Split-Brain check. > > What are your plans for the split brain check ? It's hard to do the split brain check under current implementation because there's only one remus connection between the two domain. We may need to add a heardbeat module to do this. > > Thanks, > Ian. > . > -- Thanks, Yang.