From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 9BD29E00C24; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:55:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:55:15 PDT Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C34E2E00B6F for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27089 invoked by uid 1003); 6 Jun 2014 22:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.123?) (philip@opensdr.com@71.171.40.82) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Jun 2014 22:48:34 -0000 Message-ID: <53924541.3060109@balister.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:48:33 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Dmytriyenko , Cliff Brake References: <7D46E86EC0A8354091174257B2FED1015D09841A@DLEE11.ent.ti.com> <20140606154235.GA18034@edge> In-Reply-To: <20140606154235.GA18034@edge> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: what branch of meta-ti should be used with dora? X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 22:55:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/06/2014 11:42 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:32:32AM -0400, Cliff Brake wrote: >> got it. Looking further, I happened to be using >> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/meta-ti, so that is why I >> don't see the dora branch. Thanks! > > And that is NOT meta-ti! > > That is actually a very wicked way to discredit the project... I've heard > first-hand few other instances when people were confused by that stale fork > into thinking meta-ti is dead. :( > Oh come on, it is labeled as a mirror. I updated the banner to point at the YP git. https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/meta-ti Philip