From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing clock/pin-control entries for I2S0 on Exynos4 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:06:50 +0200 Message-ID: <5395954A.5070203@samsung.com> References: <1402133454-28445-1-git-send-email-tushar.b@samsung.com> <5395841B.8000702@samsung.com> <53958FF0.40101@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:51441 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932194AbaFILHB (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:07:01 -0400 Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N6W00J43EVJQTA0@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:06:55 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <53958FF0.40101@gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tushar Behera , Tushar Behera Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com On 09/06/14 12:44, Tushar Behera wrote: > IMHO, the clock entries belong here as the audss clock provider > essentially remains same for all Exynos4 based systems. > > As for pin-control entry, I believe we can move them to respective SoC > dtsi files. > > Does that sound okay to you? I guess that's fine, I tend to agree with you about the clocks. -- Thanks, Sylwester