From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ssujith@cisco.com,
gvaradar@cisco.com, benve@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:00:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53971D93.7070508@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1406101900400.2499@ws.cisco>
Hello.
On 06/10/2014 05:52 PM, Govindarajulu Varadarajan wrote:
> >> @@ -1192,6 +1195,33 @@ static void enic_calc_int_moderation(struct enic
>>> *enic, struct vnic_rq *rq)
>>> pkt_size_counter->small_pkt_bytes_cnt = 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>>> +static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>>> +{
>>> + free_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap);
>>> + enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap = NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>> No need to use *inline* in a .c file, the compiler should figure it out.
> Yes, I agree.
>>> +{
>>> + int i, res;
>>> +
>>> + if (vnic_dev_get_intr_mode(enic->vdev) == VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_MSIX) {
>>> + enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap = alloc_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->rq_count);
>>> + if (unlikely(!enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap))
>>> + return;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < enic->rq_count; i++) {
>>> + res = irq_cpu_rmap_add(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap,
>>> + enic->msix_entry[i].vector);
>>> + if (unlikely(res)) {
>>> + enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +}
>> It's better to do the following here:
>> #else
>> static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>> {
>> }
>> static void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>> {
>> }
> How about
> static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> ...
> ...
> #endif
> }
> I prefer this over yours because, if I use yours tools like cscope finds two
> definitions of function enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap. Which makes code walk through
> little bit difficult.
#ifdef's in the function bodies are generally frowned upon. See
Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 2 item (2).
> Thanks
> Govind
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> static int enic_poll_msix(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>>> {
>>> struct net_device *netdev = napi->dev;
>>> @@ -1267,6 +1297,9 @@ static void enic_free_intr(struct enic *enic)
>>> struct net_device *netdev = enic->netdev;
>>> unsigned int i;
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>>> + enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>>> +#endif
>> ... so that you can avoid #ifdef's at the call sites.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 18:32 [PATCH net-next 0/8] enic updates Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] flow_keys: Record IP layer protocol in skb_flow_dissect() Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 13:11 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-10 14:08 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-11 22:06 ` David Miller
2014-06-11 22:08 ` David Miller
2014-06-12 5:38 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-19 18:06 ` Chema Gonzalez
2014-06-19 18:52 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-24 5:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-06-26 6:34 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-09-18 14:18 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:02 ` [PATCH net] net: sched: shrink struct qdisc_skb_cb to 28 bytes Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 16:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-09-18 16:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:07 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 19:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 19:31 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 20:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 21:28 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 22:29 ` [net] " Doug Ledford
2014-09-19 12:07 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-22 18:38 ` David Miller
2014-09-22 18:22 ` [PATCH net] " David Miller
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] enic: fix return value in _vnic_dev_cmd Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] enic: devcmd for adding IP 5 tuple hardware filters Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-10 13:52 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 15:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] enic: Add Accelerated RFS support Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] enic: fix lockdep around devcmd_lock Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] enic: add low latency socket busy_poll support Govindarajulu Varadarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53971D93.7070508@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=_govind@gmx.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gvaradar@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssujith@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.