From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WuOL5-0006VB-Kn for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:51:56 +0000 Message-ID: <53972984.8020303@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:51:32 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : ath10k: firmware crash in station mode & problem DFS References: <1399565896-29791-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> , <5386059B.7040301@candelatech.com> , <53889A89.90802@candelatech.com> , <538CAACA.2030202@candelatech.com> , <538E9D26.4040009@candelatech.com> , <538F9255.1060101@candelatech.com> , <5390A9CC.7060400@candelatech.com> , <5391E363.50907@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Vu Hai NGUYEN Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , Patrick CARNEIRO RODRIGUEZ , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Janusz Dziedzic On 06/10/2014 12:15 AM, Vu Hai NGUYEN wrote: >> Can you please see if this firmware is any better for the DFS issue? >> >> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/firmware-2-community-scan3-a.bin > > Thanks, I check your firmware but it can not fix the problem Can you explain how you test this? Do I need a special AP configuration to do the test, or is a normal ath10k NIC and hostapd enough? I can try to reproduce the problem and test the fixes here. >> Ok, looks like the patch where I change the scan state machine logic is the bad one. >> >> I will review it carefully and maybe try splitting it further today. >> >> Are you able to test with a modified kernel? If so, I can add debuglog >> messages to the firmware and give you a kernel ath10k patch to print >> those out in the kernel logs so you can send them to me for decoding... > > Sorry I don't really get it, you mean that I can re-compiled ath10k for my own > kernel? Actually I'm using backport to compile ath10k for my kernel 3.2.36 provided > for my chipset, If so, I can do it. Let me try to reproduce it myself first..that will be the fastest way for me to fix the problem I think. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k