From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WuUwk-00056q-CP for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:55:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F58840A9E6 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53978CBD.3020404@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:54:53 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: How to configure hostapd + ath10k for DFS channel? References: <53978B53.8050501@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <53978B53.8050501@candelatech.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k On 06/10/2014 03:48 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > > I'm trying to put an AP on a DFS channel (52) in order to test > my CT firmware in station mode on DFS channels. > > I have tried both CT and standard upstream 10.1.467-2.1 firmware on > the AP machine, with similar behaviour (hostapd will not start > because DFS cannot set channel, or something like that). > > Kernel is 'ath', fairly recent, with a bunch of my own ath10k > patches applied (though they should mostly not be doing anything > different from upstream when running standard firmware). Actually, this was hacked upon 3.14.6+ kernel...will try with newer kernel... Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k