From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] iio: adc: at91: signedness bug in at91_adc_get_trigger_value_by_name()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:36:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53980711.5030604@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140611065356.GB16443@mwanda>
Am 11.06.2014 08:53, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> The function returns a u8 so the -ENOMEM is truncated to a positive
> value. The caller tests for zero returns and treats them as an error
> so I have changed the -ENOMEM to 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 3b5bacd..5ebe33d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static u8 at91_adc_get_trigger_value_by_name(struct iio_dev *idev,
> idev->id,
> triggers[i].name);
> if (!name)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return 0;
>
> if (strcmp(trigger_name, name) = 0) {
> value = triggers[i].value;
hi Dan,
LXR says there is only 1 caller (and he is checking for ENOMON)
perhaps it is better to change the return value to int.
re,
wh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] iio: adc: at91: signedness bug in at91_adc_get_trigger_value_by_name()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:36:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53980711.5030604@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140611065356.GB16443@mwanda>
Am 11.06.2014 08:53, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> The function returns a u8 so the -ENOMEM is truncated to a positive
> value. The caller tests for zero returns and treats them as an error
> so I have changed the -ENOMEM to 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 3b5bacd..5ebe33d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static u8 at91_adc_get_trigger_value_by_name(struct iio_dev *idev,
> idev->id,
> triggers[i].name);
> if (!name)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return 0;
>
> if (strcmp(trigger_name, name) == 0) {
> value = triggers[i].value;
hi Dan,
LXR says there is only 1 caller (and he is checking for ENOMON)
perhaps it is better to change the return value to int.
re,
wh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 6:53 [patch] iio: adc: at91: signedness bug in at91_adc_get_trigger_value_by_name() Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 6:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 7:36 ` walter harms [this message]
2014-06-11 7:36 ` walter harms
2014-06-11 8:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 8:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 8:27 ` walter harms
2014-06-11 8:27 ` walter harms
2014-06-11 8:13 ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 8:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-06-11 14:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-06-11 14:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-06-14 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-06-14 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53980711.5030604@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.