From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix rounding of core_pct
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:08:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539862DB.9060905@semaphore.gr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <009b01cf857a$d5032090$7f0961b0$@net>
On 11/06/2014 04:41 μμ, Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2014.06.11 05:34 Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>
>> Local variable core_pct holds fixed point values.
>> When we round it we add "1" to core_pct. This has almost
>> no effect.
>>
>> So, add int_toftp(1) to core_pct when rounding.
>>
>> For example, in a given sample point (values taken from
>> tracepoint) with:
>> aperf = 5024
>> mperf = 10619
>>
>> the core_pct is (before rounding):
>> core_pct = 12111
>> fp_toint(core_pct) = 47
>>
>> After rounding:
>> core_pct = 12112
>> fp_toint(core_pct) = 47
>>
>> After rounding with int_toftp(1):
>> core_pct = 12367
>> fp_toint(core_pct) = 48
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> I'm sorry for submitting again in merge window, but
>> I thought that maybe we need this fix for 3.16.
>>
>>
>> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> index 4e7f492..dd80aa2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
>> core_pct = div_u64_rem(core_pct, int_tofp(sample->mperf), &rem);
>>
>> if ((rem << 1) >= int_tofp(sample->mperf))
>> - core_pct += 1;
>> + core_pct += int_tofp(1);
>>
>> sample->freq = fp_toint(
>> mul_fp(int_tofp(cpu->pstate.max_pstate * 1000), core_pct));
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>
> No.
>
> The intent was only ever to round properly the pseudo floating point result of the divide.
> It was much more important (ugh, well 4 times more) when FRACBITS was still 6, which also got changed to 8 in a recent patch.
>
Are you sure? This rounding was very recently added.
As far as I can understand, I don't see the meaning of this rounding, as is.
Even if FRAC_BITS was 6, I think it would have almost no improvement in
calculations.
Stratos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 12:33 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix rounding of core_pct Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-11 13:41 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 13:41 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 14:08 ` Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2014-06-11 15:02 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 15:02 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-11 21:40 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 21:40 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 21:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-12 6:56 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-12 6:56 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 20:20 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-11 21:15 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 21:15 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-12 14:35 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-12 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-06-13 6:49 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-13 6:49 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-13 17:39 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-13 13:48 ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-06-13 14:36 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-13 14:36 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-13 16:56 ` Stratos Karafotis
2014-06-11 14:27 ` Doug Smythies
2014-06-11 14:27 ` Doug Smythies
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539862DB.9060905@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.