All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: restore ability to access host fs through standard commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:45:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5398797D.2050508@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5397CD37.2050607@atmel.com>

On 06/10/2014 09:29 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
> On 6/11/2014 6:43 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Commit 95fac6ab4589 "sandbox: Use os functions to read host device tree"
>> removed the ability for get_device_and_partition() to handle the "host"
>> device type, and redirect accesses to it to the host filesystem. This
>> broke some unit tests that use this feature. So, revert that change. The
>> code added back by this patch is slightly different to pacify checkpatch.
>>
>> However, we're then left with "host" being both:
>> - A pseudo device that accesses the hosts real filesystem.
>> - An emulated block device, which accesses "sectors" inside a file stored
>>    on the host.
>>
>> In order to resolve this discrepancy, rename the pseudo device from host
>> to hostfs, and adjust the unit-tests for this change.

>> diff --git a/disk/part.c b/disk/part.c

>>  +    /*
>> +     * Special-case a psuedo block device "hostfs", to allow access
>> to the
>> +     * host's own filesystem.
>> +     */
>
> Do we need to change the sb ls help message from 'host' to 'hostfs' as
> well?

Yes.

>> +    if (0 == strcmp(ifname, "hostfs")) {
>> +        *dev_desc = NULL;
>> +        info->start = = 0;
>
> a typo. one additional '='.

Indeed. I guess I forgot to recompile after fixing checkpatch:-/

>> diff --git a/test/command_ut.c b/test/command_ut.c

>> @@ -165,12 +165,12 @@ static int do_ut_cmd(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
>> int argc, char * const argv[])
>>     #ifdef CONFIG_SANDBOX
>>       /* File existence */
>> -    HUSH_TEST(e, "-e host -
>> creating_this_file_breaks_uboot_unit_test", n);
>> -    run_command("sb save host -
>> creating_this_file_breaks_uboot_unit_test 0 1", 0);
>> -    HUSH_TEST(e, "-e host -
>> creating_this_file_breaks_uboot_unit_test", y);
>> +    HUSH_TEST(e, "-e hostfs -
>> creating_this_file_breaks_uboot_unit_test", n);
> 
> There still has a odd behavior:
> at first, when we run 'sb load host 0 200000 /home/env.sh', it will show
> '** Bad device host 0 **'
> but after use 'sb bind 0 test.img', then above command can work well.

"sb load" works fine for me on *hostfs*:

=> sb ls hostfs - /boot
...
        176764 memtest86+.bin
...
=> sb load hostfs - 0 /boot/memtest86+.bin
176764 bytes read in 29 ms (5.8 MiB/s)

I'm not sure if "sb load" on "host" is expected to work; "host" is an
emulated block device that works just like any other block device, i.e.
without using the "sb" comamnd, so I'd expect it to be used with plain
old ls/fatls/extls, load/fatload/ext2load/, ...

> IMHO, we need use 'host' and 'hostfs' for different usage. suck like:
> 'host' interface means host block device that we use 'sb bind'.
> 'hostfs' interface means host file system

That's what this patch should provide.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-06-11 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-10 22:43 [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: restore ability to access host fs through standard commands Stephen Warren
2014-06-11  3:29 ` Josh Wu
2014-06-11 15:45   ` Stephen Warren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5398797D.2050508@wwwdotorg.org \
    --to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.