From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix race condition between btrfs and udev
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:23:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5399474A.3040003@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402488698-12518-1-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Wang,
> Futher, a easy way to trigger this problem is by running the following
> c codes repeatedly:
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> /* pass a btrfs block device */
> int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_EXCL);
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror("fail to open: %s", strerror(errno));
> exit(1);
> }
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> }
>
> So the problem is RW opening would trigger udev event which will
> call btrfs_scan_one_device().
> In btrfs_scan_one_device(), it
> would open the block device with EXCL flag..meanwhile if another
> program try to open that device with O_EXCL, it would fail with
> EBUSY.
Expected. But do we need O_EXCL in kernel:btrfs_scan_one_device()
at all ?
> This happen seldomly in the real world, but if we use loop device
> for test, we may hit this annoying problem.
> A walkaround way to solve this problem is to wait kernel scanning
> finished and then try it again.
I agree this happens seldom in production. But I don't agree on
something to fix as workaround.
Just sent out the patch:
btrfs: looping mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> may fail with EBUSY
which I believe can be a final fix. Your review / tests appreciated.
Thanks, Anand
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-11 12:11 [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix race condition between btrfs and udev Wang Shilong
2014-06-11 12:23 ` Tomasz Torcz
2014-06-12 6:23 ` Anand Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5399474A.3040003@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.