From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:48:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <539ED993.80807@acm.org> (raw)
Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() and
spin_lock_nest_lock().
This patch has the intentional side effect that it avoids that the
following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested() when
building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:
include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
^
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867f..32b16cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
_raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map); \
} while (0)
#else
-# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass) _raw_spin_lock(lock)
-# define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) _raw_spin_lock(lock)
+# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass) \
+ ((void)(subclass), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
+# define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock) \
+ ((void)(nest_lock), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK)
--
1.8.4.5
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-16 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-16 11:48 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-06-17 1:20 ` [PATCH] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument David Rientjes
2014-07-22 0:47 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=539ED993.80807@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.