From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: Boot warnings on exynos5420 based boards Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:54:49 +0530 Message-ID: <53A03391.8040207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <53A007F7.6020103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A01039.2020302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:54388 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932196AbaFQM0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:26:35 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:56:32 +0530 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sachin Kamat Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYyBXZWlz?= =?UTF-8?B?YmVja2Vy?= On 06/17/2014 05:25 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Srivatsa, > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat > wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 03:03 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >>>> Below is an updated patch, please let me know how it goes. (You'll have to >>>> revert c47a9d7cca first, and then 56e692182, before trying this patch). >>> >>> I am unable to apply your below patch on top of the above 2 reverts. >>> Applying: CPU hotplug, smp: Execute any pending IPI callbacks before CPU offline >>> fatal: corrupt patch at line 106 >>> Patch failed at 0001 CPU hotplug, smp: Execute any pending IPI >>> callbacks before CPU offline >>> >>> Even with 'patch' I get the below failures: >>> patching file kernel/smp.c >>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 53. >>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 179. >>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/smp.c.rej >>> >> >> Hmm, weird. My mailer must have screwed it up. >> >> Let's try again: >> >> [In case this also doesn't work for you, please use this git tree in which >> I have reverted the 2 old commits and added this updated patch. >> >> git://github.com/srivatsabhat/linux.git ipi-offline-fix-v3 >> ] > > Unfortunately the attached patch did not apply either. Nevertheless, I > applied the > patch from your above mentioned tree. With that patch I do not see the warnings > that I mentioned in my first mail. Thanks for fixing it. > Sure, thanks for reporting the bug and testing the updated patch! By the way, I think there is some problem in the workflow that you use to copy-paste/apply the patch. I tried applying both patches (that I sent in 2 different mails) and both applied properly without any problems. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srivatsa S. Bhat) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:54:49 +0530 Subject: Boot warnings on exynos5420 based boards In-Reply-To: References: <53A007F7.6020103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53A01039.2020302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <53A03391.8040207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/17/2014 05:25 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Srivatsa, > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat > wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 03:03 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >>>> Below is an updated patch, please let me know how it goes. (You'll have to >>>> revert c47a9d7cca first, and then 56e692182, before trying this patch). >>> >>> I am unable to apply your below patch on top of the above 2 reverts. >>> Applying: CPU hotplug, smp: Execute any pending IPI callbacks before CPU offline >>> fatal: corrupt patch at line 106 >>> Patch failed at 0001 CPU hotplug, smp: Execute any pending IPI >>> callbacks before CPU offline >>> >>> Even with 'patch' I get the below failures: >>> patching file kernel/smp.c >>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 53. >>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 179. >>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/smp.c.rej >>> >> >> Hmm, weird. My mailer must have screwed it up. >> >> Let's try again: >> >> [In case this also doesn't work for you, please use this git tree in which >> I have reverted the 2 old commits and added this updated patch. >> >> git://github.com/srivatsabhat/linux.git ipi-offline-fix-v3 >> ] > > Unfortunately the attached patch did not apply either. Nevertheless, I > applied the > patch from your above mentioned tree. With that patch I do not see the warnings > that I mentioned in my first mail. Thanks for fixing it. > Sure, thanks for reporting the bug and testing the updated patch! By the way, I think there is some problem in the workflow that you use to copy-paste/apply the patch. I tried applying both patches (that I sent in 2 different mails) and both applied properly without any problems. Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat